The role of government in the Constitution of the United States Essay

In this paper, we will discuss three questions concerning the Constitution of the United States. The first question is 1) is the government proposed by the Constitution a good idea for this country? 2) Is it a practical government? 3) Is it a feasible government? When at first, the Continental Congress had made for the government of the United States, the Articles of Confederation. Overtime it happened that these articles became insufficient, and a new form of government became inevitable. Therefore, after months of debate, Congress formed an entirely new kind of government known as the Constitution. When the time came for the ratification of the new constitution by the people, it so happened that there were those among congress who did not what the new constitution to be ratified. The party who opposed the ratification of the constitution, were to become known as antifederalists and one of the antifederalists greatest objections were, can a government comprised of check and balances protect the rights of individuals? Another words the problem was, how to give the government enough power to rule without giving it too much power? Overtime, the house was divided into two groups the Federalists, who were mostly highclass businesspersons, slave owners, and bankers and antiFederalists, who were mostly lowerclass businesspersons and farmers. The Federalists believed in a strong national government and were in support of the constitution. The antiFederalists believe that the new government would have too much power and would tread on peoples liberties. AntiFederalists fear that in giving too much power to the central government States rights would be overlooked and the government would become a tyranny. The Federalists answered this objection by stating that, if this country does not have a strong central government, then, the country is going to be run by the mob, and this will lead to anarchy and division. Alexander Hamilton one the leading Federalists states, The constitution is the perfect balance between liberty and power. In the new form of government there going to be three, separate branches of government, but these branches were going to be part of a system known as checks and balances. This way each branch would check the other branch, therefore not allowing any one branch to have too much power. This is how the Federalists intended the new constitution to work for the good of all people. The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, selfappointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny (James Madison, Federalist Papers). Madison in this argument is trying to show that, the people or the mob can trample on peoples rights just as easily as a king can. Therefore, it is necessary, state the Federalists, to have a strong government with checks and balances to avoid anarchy, division, and tyrannical mobs. The antiFederalists on the other hand disagree, stating that, the new constitution puts no limits on how long a