The difference between the Kenyah and Kayan tribes Essay

Travelers were shocked by skulls and human remains ornamenting villages. "The skulls of deceased foemen" littered a cannibal village to such an extent the "children play with them as with toys (William Fisher Alder). Europeans witnessed women and children joyfully "partake of the flesh" (Henry Ling Roth and Hugh Brooke Low). The Dayak of Borneo were cannibals who participated in "human sacrifice" and seemed "greatly addicted to it" (George Windsor Earl). Although their state as the head hunter, but Sexual perversion of any form as we think, extremely rare among the pagan tribes of Borneo. We have never heard of any case of homosexuality on good authority, and we have never heard any reference made to it and that constitutes, to our thinking, strong evidence that vice of that kind is unknown among most of the tribes.
Through the observation conducted, the author found that most ethnic Kenyah live on the land higher than the center of Borneo with a river being the main source of daily activities. There's also some of them who live in villages in scattered in the placements of ethnic Kayan. In most aspects, ethnic Kenyah have more close contact to the ethnic Kayan compared to the ethnic Iban. Is generally, way of life and culture ethnic Kenyah together with Kayan. The difference between the Kenyah and Kayan can be seen through implant body, thought, language and the nature of physical being. The difference is obvious in terms of physical characteristics between the ethnic Kenyah and Kayan such as is in terms of skin color. The skin color of the Kenyah is fairer than the Kayans. Below is a clear example of how the writer used a descriptive approach to give clear information about the ethnic Kenyah. Kenyahs speak a number of dialects of the same language, and these differ so widely that Kenyahs of widely separated districts cannot converse freely with one another but, as with all the peoples, except the Sea Dayaks, nearly every man has the command of several dialects as well as of the Kayan language.
The Kenyahs form a less homogeneous and clearly defined tribe than the Kayans, yet their main social organisation is very similar to that of the Kayans, although with regards to physical characters and language as well as some customs, they present closer affinities with other peoples than with the Kayans, especially with the Klemantans. The Kenyah tribe also comprises a number of named branches, though these are less clearly defined than the subtribes of the Kayan people. Each branch is generally named after the river on the banks of which its villages are situated, or were situated at some comparatively recent time of which the memory is preserved. In many cases a single village adopts the name of some tributary stream near the mouth of which it is situated, and the people speak of themselves by this name. Thus it seems clear that the named branches of the Kenyah tribe are nothing more than local groups