The purpose of a Healthy Communicative Relationship moral theory Essay

Two human parties are having a conversation with opposing viewpoints. These parties can be individuals, communities, or on the larger scale, countries. Ideally, both parties would choose to have a Healthy Communicative Relationship, meaning neither side would dismiss the other in any judgmental or demoralizing manner. Each side would listen respectfully to the others platform, and if not agreeable would counter with their own opinion about the topic. Both sides would strive to achieve an agreeable understanding. If one cannot be achieved, it still is the moral obligation of both parties to conclude the conversation with maintaining a Healthy Communicative Relationship. This type of conclusion would eliminate perceptions of defeat, feelings of anger, inferiority or superiority that may normally be left lingering between the parties.

Therefore the purpose of a Healthy Communicative Relationship moral theory is to have foundation in which humans can avoid sociological conflicts such as racism, religious persecution, domestic abuse, bullying, etc. This mandate nourishes healthy social standings across a plethora of current economic, political, sociological, and religious conflicts of the 21st century.

To achieve this mandate, we are to govern moral behavior by using an open floor approach. Meaning that, limited to humans only, every interactive relationship should be entered into with an open mind and an open heart. In order to do this, one needs to practice listening to understand information being presented on both an analytical and emotional platform, instead of hearing and concentrating solely on a possible response to the information being received. So what does that mean?

Hearing refers to the sounds that you hear, whereas listening requires more than that it requires focus. Listening means paying attention not only to the story, but how it is told, the use of language and voice, and how the other person uses his or her body. In other words, it means being aware of both verbal and nonverbal messages. The ability to listen effectively depends on the degree to which you perceive and understand messages.1 After the speaker is done, it is ideal for the listener to use clarifying questions to make sure that their perception of the information is correct. Listening effectively will eliminate miscommunication which otherwise would cause a breakdown in the relationship leading to frustration and irritation.

Still using the open floor approach, both parties should work on putting the speaker at ease with an open heart. Humans should morally hold themselves accountable to look at issues from the opposing parties perspective. Let go of preconceived ideas by having an open mind, therefore allowing empathetic connection with the speaker. If a listener has a disagreeable perspective, then politely wait in order to respect the speakers needs and concerns. Once the speaker has concluded, the listener can now counter communicate while still exuberating verbally and nonverbally with the already established empathetic connection. This can be achieved by being openly candid, asserting opinions respectfully, and by treating the listener with empathy. Each party involved has to be deliberate with the open floor a